Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

A Skeptic's Case for Nuclear Disarmament - Michael E. O'Hanlon - cover
A Skeptic's Case for Nuclear Disarmament - Michael E. O'Hanlon - cover
Dati e Statistiche
Wishlist Salvato in 0 liste dei desideri
A Skeptic's Case for Nuclear Disarmament
Disponibile in 2 settimane
29,10 €
29,10 €
Disp. in 2 settimane
Chiudi
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
29,10 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 2 settimane disponibile in 2 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
29,10 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 2 settimane disponibile in 2 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
Chiudi

Tutti i formati ed edizioni

Chiudi
A Skeptic's Case for Nuclear Disarmament - Michael E. O'Hanlon - cover
Chiudi

Promo attive (0)

Descrizione


In 2007 two former U.S. secretaries of state, a defense secretary, and a former senator wrote persuasively in the Wall Street Journal that the time had come to move seriously toward a nuclear-free world. Almost two years later, the Global Zero movement was born with its chief aim to rid the world of such weapons once and for all by 2030. But is it realistic or even wise to envision a world without nuclear weapons? More and more people seem to think so. Barack Obama has declared "America's commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons". But that is easier said than done. Michael O'Hanlon places his own indelible stamp on this critical issue, putting forth a "friendly skeptic's case for nuclear disarmament". Calls to "ban the bomb" are as old as the bomb itself, but the pace and organization of nonproliferation campaigns have picked up greatly recently. The growing Global Zero movement, for example, wants treaty negotiations to begin in 2019. Would this be prudent or even feasible in a world that remains dangerous, divided, and unpredictable? After all, America's nuclear arsenal has been its military trump card for much of the period since World War II. Pursuing a nuclear weapons ban prematurely or carelessly could alarm allies, leading them to consider building their own weapons - the opposite of the intended effect. O'Hanlon clearly presents the dangers of nuclear weapons and the advantages of disarmament as a goal. But even once an accord is in place, he notes, temporary suspension of restrictions may be necessary in response to urgent threats such as nuclear "cheating" or discovery of an advanced biological weapons program. To take all nuclear options off the table forever strengthens the hand of those that either do not make that pledge or do not honor it. For the near term, traditional approaches to arms control, including dismantling existing bomb inventories, can pave the way to make a true nonproliferation regime possible in the decades ahead.
Leggi di più Leggi di meno

Dettagli

2013
Paperback / softback
174 p.
Testo in English
229 x 152 mm
9780815725435
Chiudi
Aggiunto

L'articolo è stato aggiunto al carrello

Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

Chiudi

Chiudi

Siamo spiacenti si è verificato un errore imprevisto, la preghiamo di riprovare.

Chiudi

Verrai avvisato via email sulle novità di Nome Autore