Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

Gender, Athletes' Rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport - Helen Jefferson Lenskyj - cover
Gender, Athletes' Rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport - Helen Jefferson Lenskyj - cover
Dati e Statistiche
Wishlist Salvato in 0 liste dei desideri
Gender, Athletes' Rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Disponibile in 2 settimane
99,80 €
99,80 €
Disp. in 2 settimane
Chiudi
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
99,80 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 2 settimane disponibile in 2 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
ibs
99,80 € Spedizione gratuita
disponibile in 2 settimane disponibile in 2 settimane
Info
Nuovo
Altri venditori
Prezzo e spese di spedizione
Chiudi

Tutti i formati ed edizioni

Chiudi
Gender, Athletes' Rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport - Helen Jefferson Lenskyj - cover
Chiudi

Promo attive (0)

Descrizione


Disputes over gender, doping, and eligibility in Olympic sport are widely covered in sport studies and in the mainstream media. Less well known are the functions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), and the threat it poses to athletes' rights by depriving them of access to their own countries' court systems. CAS loosely follows the model of international arbitration tribunals. As in forced arbitration outside of sport, employees - in this case, high performance athletes - sign contracts agreeing to arbitration rather than litigation as the sole means of dispute resolution. Promoting the concept of sport exceptionalism, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) justifies the power it exercises through CAS by claiming that sport must be autonomous and self-regulating, with disputes settled by specialist arbitrators. Arguments in support of this position point to lex sportiva (global sports law) as a valid legal principle in sport-related disputes, which, it is claimed, cannot be understood or resolved by non-specialists. Self-regulation works effectively to protect the Olympic industry brand by keeping disputes 'in the family'. This critical analysis of CAS's history and functions demonstrates how athletes' rights are threatened by the forced arbitration process at CAS. In particular, CAS decisions involving female and gender-variant athletes, and racialized men and women, reflect numerous injustices. As well as the chronic problem of CAS's lack of independence, other issues examined here include confidentiality, lex sportiva, non-precedential awards, the closed list of specialist arbitrators, and, in doping cases, questions concerning strict liability and burden of proof.
Leggi di più Leggi di meno

Dettagli

Emerald Studies in Sport and Gender
2018
Paperback / softback
263 p.
Testo in English
198 x 129 mm
9781787542402
Chiudi
Aggiunto

L'articolo è stato aggiunto al carrello

Chiudi

Aggiungi l'articolo in

Chiudi
Aggiunto

L’articolo è stato aggiunto alla lista dei desideri

Chiudi

Crea nuova lista

Chiudi

Chiudi

Siamo spiacenti si è verificato un errore imprevisto, la preghiamo di riprovare.

Chiudi

Verrai avvisato via email sulle novità di Nome Autore